Apple loses appeal on e-book price fixing

N&P: Discussion of news headlines and politics.

Moderator: frigidmagi

Post Reply
User avatar
Josh
Resident of the Kingdom of Eternal Cockjobbery
Posts: 8114
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 4:51 pm
21
Location: Kingdom of Eternal Cockjobbery

#1 Apple loses appeal on e-book price fixing

Post by Josh »

Good riddance
federal appeals court Tuesday let stand a 2013 lower court ruling that concluded Apple conspired with several top book publishers to raise e-book prices. The Justice Department had accused Apple of unfairly taking control of a nascent market that had been dominated by Amazon.com.

Judges from the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals in New York split on the decision 2-1.
U.S. reportedly warns Apple, e-book publishers about price-fixing
U.S. reportedly warns Apple, e-book publishers about price-fixing

In a 117-page decision, Judge Debra Ann Livingston wrote that Apple pressured publishers to band together to prevent price drops for books, both electronic and print. Apple had leveraged publisher frustration with Amazon’s $9.99 per book pricing on its Kindle reader as a bargaining chip, she said.

The publishers then “combined forces to grab control over price,” she wrote, referring to five of the “Big Six” publishers -- Simon & Schuster, HarperCollins, Macmillan, Penguin and Hachette.
cComments
Got something to say? Start the conversation and be the first to comment.
Add a comment
0

“A coordinated effort to raise prices across the relevant market was present in every chapter of this story,” she added.

The story began with Apple’s 2010 launch of the iPad, a tablet that marketed its selection of e-books as a prominent feature. Until then, Amazon’s Kindle, released in 2007, had dominated the e-book market, accounting for 90% of all e-book sales within two years. Amazon sold many new releases and bestsellers at close to or lower than wholesale prices.
Apple agrees to a $400-million settlement over e-book price fixing
Apple agrees to a $400-million settlement over e-book price fixing

Publishers considered this practice a threat to their business model, Livingston said, and became determined to overcome it with the help of Apple, the newcomer eager for a foothold in the market. After negotiating attractive contracts with Apple, the publishers went to Amazon with demands for sweeter deals. Prices for iPad books could be set as high as $19.99.

Apple now may be ordered to pay $400 million to consumers, complying with a 2014 settlement of a class-action lawsuit brought by 33 states and territories.

Judge Raymond J. Lohier, in concurring with Livingston, said Apple and the publishers committed “corporate bullying” by teaming up against Amazon.

But Judge Dennis Jacobs disagreed, writing in a 38-page dissent that Apple joined with publishers as the only way to force a lower barrier to the e-book industry.

“No one publisher alone could counter Amazon,” he wrote. “Apple’s conduct … was unambiguously and overwhelmingly procompetitive.”

Apple disagreed with the ruling and denied that it fixed e-book prices.

“While we want to put this behind us, the case is about principles and values,” the company said in a statement Tuesday. “We know we did nothing wrong back in 2010 and are assessing next steps.”
"We know we did nothing wrong" whatthefuckever.

The ruling on this case has cost us a bit of potential revenue and will continue to do so on the publishing side of things. But as a consumer of books and a proponent of reasonable pricing, I'm glad they got jammed up on this scheme, because it's classic big business bullshit of either monopolizing or rigging a market to force a price point and fuck the consumers. They got hit with a market disruption that broke their old model and chose to collude rather than compete, essentially.

Considering what a bunch of crooks traditional publishing is, I'm pretty happy with anything that gives their shorts a bit of a yank.

At the heart of this case was the simple fact that the oldheads of traditional publishing saw ebooks as fluffery for geeks and operated under the notion that the (extortionate, overpriced) vehicle of hardcovers and trade paperbacks would continue to be their primary cash cow.* Amazon dropping prices on new releases down to ten bucks while hardcover new releases were clocking in at thirty was drawing away from that revenue stream.

That's called evolution, assholes.

That isn't to say Amazon is full of angels and kittens, but I do tend to side more with consumer-oriented businesses and Amazon slops a bit more in that direction. There's plenty on the business side that I don't care for with them, but they're more workable at the moment.

* You have twenty dollar TPBs, Josh! Why yes, yes we do. They're also priced at the next nearest 99 cents above minimum cost level from Createspace, which has a lot to do with producing big fat books that can be used to club your foeman to death in a pinch, because I fucking care about my readers and want them to never be without a weapon in case something goes awry. Starting with B4 we probably will be bumping it up a little bit, not for reason of profitability (TPB sales spike briefly on release and then dive through the toilet because they serve the twin purpose of providing a bit of hardcopy for friends and family and people who want autographed books and also as a loss leader for the epubs) but rather for strategic purposes in terms of getting listed properly in a couple of the big distro catalogues, which is another subject that would take several paragraphs to hash out.
When the Frog God smiles, arm yourself.
"'Flammable' and 'inflammable' have the same meaning! This language is insane!"
GIVE ME COFFEE AND I WILL ALLOW YOU TO LIVE!- Frigid
"Ork 'as no automatic code o' survival. 'is partic'lar distinction from all udda livin' gits is tha necessity ta act inna face o' alternatives by means o' dakka."
I created the sound of madness, wrote the book on pain
User avatar
Cynical Cat
Arch-Magician
Posts: 11930
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 8:53 pm
21
Location: Ice Sarcophagus outside a ruined Jedi Temple
Contact:

#2 Re: Apple loses appeal on e-book price fixing

Post by Cynical Cat »

It's not quite that simple because the motivation for this bit of price fixing was to get away from Amazon's monopolistic control of the ebook industry. I'm not a fan of what they did and they got burned because it was forcing a high price point on consumers, but they were doing it to get Seattle's dead hand off their throats.

I don't love the price fixing, but I hate the Amazon monopoly even more.
It's not that I'm unforgiving, it's that most of the people who wrong me are unrepentant assholes.
User avatar
Josh
Resident of the Kingdom of Eternal Cockjobbery
Posts: 8114
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 4:51 pm
21
Location: Kingdom of Eternal Cockjobbery

#3 Re: Apple loses appeal on e-book price fixing

Post by Josh »

I agree, Amazon having a nigh-monopolistic share is bad, but Apple didn't even try to leverage a cut of the market by superior offerings. I still don't know if they've gotten a "People who bought this book also bought" section in their bookstore yet. (Nook just added theirs a few months ago.)

Believe you me, I'll be happy as hell when I start seeing higher percentages come from other vendors. But the only reason Amazon had a monopoly going in this particular field was because they jumped in first on a new tech and did it well. History has shown time and again that these sort of short-term monopolies can be be broken by innovation and better appeal to consumers rather than backstage collusion.
When the Frog God smiles, arm yourself.
"'Flammable' and 'inflammable' have the same meaning! This language is insane!"
GIVE ME COFFEE AND I WILL ALLOW YOU TO LIVE!- Frigid
"Ork 'as no automatic code o' survival. 'is partic'lar distinction from all udda livin' gits is tha necessity ta act inna face o' alternatives by means o' dakka."
I created the sound of madness, wrote the book on pain
User avatar
Cynical Cat
Arch-Magician
Posts: 11930
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 8:53 pm
21
Location: Ice Sarcophagus outside a ruined Jedi Temple
Contact:

#4 Re: Apple loses appeal on e-book price fixing

Post by Cynical Cat »

Josh wrote: History has shown time and again that these sort of short-term monopolies can be be broken by innovation and better appeal to consumers rather than backstage collusion.
History as also shown the opposite. I don't like what they did, but fuck Amazon.
It's not that I'm unforgiving, it's that most of the people who wrong me are unrepentant assholes.
User avatar
Lys
Master
Posts: 1896
Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 7:37 pm
15

#5 Re: Apple loses appeal on e-book price fixing

Post by Lys »

The monopoly would be more tolerable if they didn't have this habit of engaging in blatant censorship with zero transparency. They can just up and decide that something is not kosher, take it down from the e-book store, and not even inform anyone that they did so or why. They also do all sorts of other manipulative shit that, because they're a god-damned monopoly, can screw authors with little recourse. Here's Charles Stross complaining about it about a year ago. Put simply monopolies suck, and while Apple getting reamed is all well and good it seems like something of a hollow victory when the titan continues to stand astride the market utterly unharmed.
Lys is lily, or lilium.
The pretty flowers remind me of a song of elves.
User avatar
Josh
Resident of the Kingdom of Eternal Cockjobbery
Posts: 8114
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 4:51 pm
21
Location: Kingdom of Eternal Cockjobbery

#6 Re: Apple loses appeal on e-book price fixing

Post by Josh »

Cynical Cat wrote:
Josh wrote: History has shown time and again that these sort of short-term monopolies can be be broken by innovation and better appeal to consumers rather than backstage collusion.
History as also shown the opposite. I don't like what they did, but fuck Amazon.
Amazon itself is an example of a monopoly being broken. The "Big Six" (don't even exist in that form anymore) were colluding like mad over the decades before this and pulled this stunt rather than going for actual competition. So we'll never know if Apple bookstore could've fought Amazon at that point, because they never even tried. Instead, they went to the back room to collaborate on how to continue fucking the book market with ever-elevating prices.

Amazon's issues abound, no doubt. But what the product of this case was the breaking of a lot of industry handshaking deals that directly raised the price of books for consumers. Incidentally it also broke the protection deals for bestsellers that midlist didn't get and as a consequence they would get steamrolled as sacrificial offerings whenever Grisham or King or Turow dropped a book.

The Big Six needed their shit wrecked. Amazon likewise needs some shitwrecking as well. Not arguing that.
When the Frog God smiles, arm yourself.
"'Flammable' and 'inflammable' have the same meaning! This language is insane!"
GIVE ME COFFEE AND I WILL ALLOW YOU TO LIVE!- Frigid
"Ork 'as no automatic code o' survival. 'is partic'lar distinction from all udda livin' gits is tha necessity ta act inna face o' alternatives by means o' dakka."
I created the sound of madness, wrote the book on pain
User avatar
Cynical Cat
Arch-Magician
Posts: 11930
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 8:53 pm
21
Location: Ice Sarcophagus outside a ruined Jedi Temple
Contact:

#7 Re: Apple loses appeal on e-book price fixing

Post by Cynical Cat »

And if that was all it was, that would be it. But it isn't. It's also about Amazon's hardball Wallmarkeque tactics with publishers and authors and the bullshit that comes out of it. US monopoly law is pretty much worthless when it comes to suppliers so Amazon gets to harden its grip on the market while Apple gets burned instead of both of them getting torched.
It's not that I'm unforgiving, it's that most of the people who wrong me are unrepentant assholes.
Post Reply