Page 1 of 1

#1 Cheerios stands by TV ad showing mixed-race family

Posted: Sat Jun 08, 2013 5:09 pm
by frigidmagi
Yahoo
A mom sits at her kitchen table when her grade schooler saunters up with a big box of Cheerios.
"Mom," says the girl. "Dad told me Cheerios is good for your heart. Is that true?"

Cut to dad waking from a nap on the living room couch with a pile of Cheerios on his chest (where his heart is) crunchily cascading to the floor.

The message is in line with the company's Heart Healthy campaign, except this 30-second ad features a black dad, white mom and biracial child and produced enough vitriol on YouTube last week that Cheerios requested the comments section be turned off.

This week, the company is standing by the fictitious family, which reflects a black-white racial mix uncommon in commercials today, especially in ads on TV, at a time when interracial and interethnic couples are on the rise in real life, according to 2010 U.S. Census data, brand strategists and marketing consultants.

"The reality is that in general most big companies don't want to take a lot of risks," said Laura Ries, who has written five books on marketing and brand strategy and consults for companies large, small and in between.

"The ability for nameless, faceless people to get on the Internet is out there, and companies don't like it when people yell at them," she said.

Camille Gibson, vice president of marketing for Cheerios, said it's the first time the ad campaign that focuses on family moments has featured an interracial couple, with General Mills Inc. casting the actors to reflect the changing U.S. population.

"We felt like we were reflecting an American family," Gibson said.

As a large company, Minneapolis-based General Mills is used to getting some degree of negative feedback and wasn't surprised by the comments on YouTube, she said, but it was the first time the company requested the site turn the comments section off because of the vitriol.

Another site, Reddit, filtered out negative comments on a thread started with a comment in support of the ad. The site left Cheerios defenders' remarks online.

The national ad will continue running as scheduled for several more months and Cheerios isn't planning any changes, Gibson said. She declined to say whether the campaign would feature interracial ads going forward.
Overall, Gibson said, the feedback has been overwhelmingly supportive: "Consumers are actually responding very positively to the ad."

With millions of ad dollars at stake, how seriously do big companies like Cheerios take racist backlashes? Very, said Allen Adamson, managing director of the branding firm Landor Associates, but caving to critics is just as dangerous to a company as large as Cheerios.

"Advertisers for many years always took the safe route, which was to try to ruffle no feathers and in doing so became less and less authentic and real," he said. "To succeed today, big brands like Cheerios need to be in touch with what's authentic and true about American families."

Those families include married couples of different races and ethnicities who grew by 28 percent in the decade between 2000 and 2010, from 7 percent to 10 percent, Census data shows.

"The traditional approach depicting the old 'Leave it to Beaver' family, while offending no one, is not very realistic," Adamson said.

In addition to Cheerios, General Mills makes Betty Crocker cake mixes, Pillsbury refrigerated dough and Yoplait yogurts. The ad agency Saatchi & Saatchi, which created the ad, referred a call from The Associated Press to its client.

Actor Charles Malik Whitfield, who portrays the sleeping dad in the spot, thanked supporters of the ad and sees an opportunity for opening a dialogue with its detractors.

"Let's not pretend racism doesn't exist. Let's not pretend that we've come so far. Let's be conscious of and appreciate the noise, and the negativity, because there's so much work to be done," he said in a telephone interview from Los Angeles.

Cheerios is not the first brand to show a black and white couple with a biracial child. A TV commercial for Blockbuster recently featured a white mom, black dad and biracial son enjoying a rental on the couch. As far back as 2009, Philadelphia Cream Cheese and its "spread a little joy" campaign had a black man and white woman (no wedding bands) enjoying a bagel breakfast in bed.

In another along those lines, a black woman is shown kissing a white man as the two stir a bit of Philadelphia Cream Cheese into a pasta sauce and kiss.

Nina Barton, senior marketing director for Philadelphia Cream Cheese in Glenview, Ill., said in an email that the 140-year-old brand also believes its advertising "should reflect what American families look like today."

She added: "While we did receive comments, both positive and negative, in response to our national campaign, it didn't influence our future casting decisions."

In the case of Cheerios, Ries said, the benefits outweigh the risks.

"It's important for brands to take risks in line with what their brand is about," she said. "In this case Cheerios is the first food of children everywhere."
I will note with irony that black and white pairings are actually fairly rare statistically speaking. The most common interracial pairings tend to be white males and female east asians and hispanics (of both genders) and anyone else (white partners tend to dominate as well but this is no surprise given that whites are the single largest group in the US). But due to historical issues... Blacks and whites seem to be what everyone panics over. Don't know why. I mean Barry seemed to turn out alright didn't he?

Still... What interracial couples can't be in commercials or eat Cheerios now? Being upset about this in the 21st century is downright silly and foolish.

#2 Re: Cheerios stands by TV ad showing mixed-race family

Posted: Sat Jun 08, 2013 7:09 pm
by Batman
Being upset about this has been downright silly and foolish from the word 'go'. It's just that until a while ago, the people being downright silly and foolish got to get away with it.

#3 Re: Cheerios stands by TV ad showing mixed-race family

Posted: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:16 pm
by Josh
There are significant number of people who aren't even aware that Obama is biracial, and even among those who do know and oppose him, it's basically the One-Drop rule.

Personally I'm all for the future where we're all blended together in glorious non-ethnicity. But then we'll just discriminate based on shade, as we already see in various places.

#4 Re: Cheerios stands by TV ad showing mixed-race family

Posted: Sun Jun 09, 2013 5:33 pm
by LadyTevar
In WV, where there's 94% white, 4% Black, and the rest "other", Black/white pairings are the usual bi-racial pairings. Still a small portion of the overall, but where I work I see enough that it's no longer odd.

#5 Re: Cheerios stands by TV ad showing mixed-race family

Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2013 6:56 am
by General Havoc
Yeah, so I did a little kicking around, because something about this particular scandalous event smelled off to me. Not that there aren't racists about, mind you, but I wanted to see exactly who was making all this noise about how awful it was that someone showed an interracial kid on television with their cross-racial parents.

The answer? Youtube commenters.

Seriously. Check this out:
It's another one of those things that shouldn't be a story but is—an ad from a major U.S. brand featuring an interracial couple and their daughter. You'd think this new Cheerios ad from Saatchi & Saatchi in New York might go largely unnoticed, given the plethora of interracial couples on TV shows these days. (NBC's Parenthood is a notable example, though far from the only one.) But it's not going unnoticed—it hit Reddit's front page, a place largely reserved for life's great oddities, and the YouTube view count is rising fast. The problem is that TV ads have always lagged TV programming in this regard, as so many brands are clearly scared of being perceived as making a political statement with the casting of their commercials. Thus, the Cheerios ad, despite its characters being representative of tens of thousands of actual couples in America, sticks out like a sore thumb. And then you have the YouTube comments section, which predictably has devolved into an endless flame war, with references to Nazis, "troglodytes" and "racial genocide." At what point will an ad like this just seem normal?
That's a quote from Adweek, the site that basically all of the major media groups that reported on this "controversy" got their information (NYtimes and Huffington both cite it). It mentions that there are not many bi-racial people in advertising (true), and then that the comments section of the youtube version for the ad is, predictably, filled with racism and other awful shit. As all of you know already, Youtube's comments are the shower drain of the internet, a place where vile and disgusting people go to die and hopefully exist away from you and I. But apparently this is not a fact known to anyone besides us, because the fact that people said awful shit in a youtube comment is apparently massive, breaking, news.

I mean, I suppose Youtube's gutter of comment hell must be quite a shock to those not used to the bowels of internet trolldom. But this is not a matter of a massive upswing of hate. There exists no videos on Youtube that are not filled with vile racist trolling twaddle. And besides said youtube commenters (the poets of our time) there are no groups arising, outraged at the existence of this ad, not even among the actual racists of our society (at least not that I can find). I repeat, outside of trolls on youtube, nobody, not even actual racists seems to give a shit about this ad. Were I a cynical man, I would suggest that General Mills, who apparently bombarded every major news organization with the shocking fact that they had to... *gasp* disable comments on one of their ad videos on Youtube, manufactured the entire outrage as a PR stunt to make the company look properly politically correct.

After all, it does General Mills no good to simply cast an interracial family to promote their cereal, unless they ensure that every major media outlet in the country spends three news cycles praising them for having the 'guts' to do so.

I don't object to General Mills' casting choices, nor to them getting a bit of credit for doing what apparently most other companies won't even think of trying. There are indeed very few interracial families in media in general or advertising in specific, and it is good to see at least one representation thereof. But let's not speak of this like it's some valiant stand against the tide of barbarism here. General Mills, a Fortune 500 company with 15 billion dollars in yearly revenue, does not require our aid for its epic battle with the trolls of Youtube. And the fact that said trolls did to their ad what they do to literally every other video on Earth does not represent some roiling tide of one-drop-obsessed racists dragging the United States back to the Jim Crow era.

Though I admit, I eagerly await the tide of retrospective "stories" from smug, likely-European (or Californian) news sources that will describe it as exactly that.