Railgun test reaches mach 6, travels 7 km after target hit.

S&L: Discussion of matters pertaining to theoretical and applied sciences, and logical thought.

Moderator: Charon

Post Reply
User avatar
frigidmagi
Dragon Death-Marine General
Posts: 14757
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 11:03 am
19
Location: Alone and unafraid

#1 Railgun test reaches mach 6, travels 7 km after target hit.

Post by frigidmagi »

defensetech

[quote]Here’s an exclusive Defense Tech video giving you an update on General Atomics’ high-speed railgun project. Last summer, General Atomics and Boeing tested a high-speed sabot round to replace the “hypersonic bricksâ€
"it takes two sides to end a war but only one to start one. And those who do not have swords may still die upon them." Tolken
User avatar
Charon
No
Posts: 4913
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 7:30 pm
19
Location: On my boat, as always.
Contact:

#2

Post by Charon »

Looking at that video, it doesn't even look like the round slows down.

Damn.
Moderator of Philosophy and Theology
User avatar
The Cleric
Thy Kingdom Come...
Posts: 741
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 1:34 pm
19
Location: The Right Hand Of GOD
Contact:

#3

Post by The Cleric »

If it keeps going for 7km, then you likely would't notice it slowing after a few dozen m. That's freaking awesome. Much more reliable than current laser technology too.
Never shall innocent blood be shed, yet the blood of the wicked shall flow like a river.

The three shall spread their blackened wings and be the vengeful striking hammer of god.
User avatar
Cynical Cat
Arch-Magician
Posts: 11930
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 8:53 pm
19
Location: Ice Sarcophagus outside a ruined Jedi Temple
Contact:

#4

Post by Cynical Cat »

The Cleric wrote:If it keeps going for 7km, then you likely would't notice it slowing after a few dozen m. That's freaking awesome. Much more reliable than current laser technology too.
Reliable probably isn't the word you're looking for. It works, but it strips out the inside of the barrel with a few shots. It's a major problem and they have yet to solve it. It is very cool that both lasers and railguns are creeping closer and closer to being practical weapon systems. The future is now bitches.
It's not that I'm unforgiving, it's that most of the people who wrong me are unrepentant assholes.
User avatar
Hotfoot
Avatar of Confusion
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 9:28 pm
19

#5

Post by Hotfoot »

I'll point out that both railguns and lasers require considerable amounts of energy to do their jobs, and Cat is right, the rails undergo tremendous stress when they fire. Efforts are being made to reduce this, but so far as I understand it, the results are limited so far, simply because of the physics behind it. You need ferric to ferric conductive contact, so until we can come up with some sort of teflon-infused iron rails and/or slugs, well, problems arise.

Lasers, meanwhile, have massive efficiency issues. If we could find some way to recapture and use the waste photons that don't align properly, that could be improved, but barring that, we'd need a massive change in how we generate lasers to get a significant change in the power/output equation.

So to that end, Railguns are more power efficient than lasers, with much more of the juice put to use, as it were.

What's really interesting is that they've finally figured out how to sabot the railgun rounds which means depleted uranium, tungsten, explosive, and other special purpose rounds are finally on the menu. What's also interesting is that that rail barrel there seems to be round. If that's just aesthetics, it's a pity, if it's what I'm hoping for, which is rifling, that has other potential (and massive engineering problems I'm sure, but still).

Next up, force fields! :wink:
Post Reply