Star Trek: The Quadratic War

OOC: For the creation and management of board RPG's.

Moderator: B4UTRUST

User avatar
Lys
Master
Posts: 1896
Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 7:37 pm
13

#326 Re: Star Trek: The Quadratic War

Post by Lys »

Comrade Tortoise wrote:An Akira? Yes. Yes I do. Even the carrier version of an Akira has a very heavy weapons load. You might be a light cruiser, but you have a vast torpedoe arsenal and enough phasers to give my beam boat a good contest. I could take one, but probably not two at once. You can take both if they stay and fight.
Every version of the Akira is the carrier version, it's both a carrier and a torpedo boat, or rather a long-range fire support ship. Like the Defiant class, it's probably built as a warship making it very strong pound for pound, but its beam armament is still just for self-defence. There's only three phaser strips, one large one on the top saucer, and two smaller ones on the bottom saucer, with no rear coverage.

Though, DS9 TM does list it as having six phaser arrays. It's not wholly unreasonable, but i'm not sure where exactly would you put them, as the ship's already kind of crowded with armaments. Maybe two of them on trailing edge of the nacelle pylons to give it some rear coverage, and the sixth... no idea. That the extra three arrays would make it a better contender for close in engagements, but at that point you're might be pushing the limits of what the ship can do. A lot of its internal space is already taken up by the flight deck and torpedo magazines, which makes it difficult to add extra phaser arrays and the attendant capacitors and power conduits. Could be either way, though.
Lys is lily, or lilium.
The pretty flowers remind me of a song of elves.
User avatar
Cynical Cat
Arch-Magician
Posts: 11930
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 8:53 pm
19
Location: Ice Sarcophagus outside a ruined Jedi Temple
Contact:

#327 Re: Star Trek: The Quadratic War

Post by Cynical Cat »

Stats for the Akira are all over the place. I've seen 2, 8, and 15 for torpedo launchers, fighters and not fighters, and all number of phaser banks.
It's not that I'm unforgiving, it's that most of the people who wrong me are unrepentant assholes.
User avatar
Josh
Resident of the Kingdom of Eternal Cockjobbery
Posts: 8114
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 4:51 pm
19
Location: Kingdom of Eternal Cockjobbery

#328 Re: Star Trek: The Quadratic War

Post by Josh »

THAT ROCKED.

We need to figure out how to weaponize that.

Okay, time to pick up the pieces.

PS: No such thing as a 'certus cutaneous cluster', but a Betazed ain't gonna have radial, median, and ulnar nerves, soooooo...
When the Frog God smiles, arm yourself.
"'Flammable' and 'inflammable' have the same meaning! This language is insane!"
GIVE ME COFFEE AND I WILL ALLOW YOU TO LIVE!- Frigid
"Ork 'as no automatic code o' survival. 'is partic'lar distinction from all udda livin' gits is tha necessity ta act inna face o' alternatives by means o' dakka."
I created the sound of madness, wrote the book on pain
User avatar
Josh
Resident of the Kingdom of Eternal Cockjobbery
Posts: 8114
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 4:51 pm
19
Location: Kingdom of Eternal Cockjobbery

#329 Re: Star Trek: The Quadratic War

Post by Josh »

Kolar's entry edited.
When the Frog God smiles, arm yourself.
"'Flammable' and 'inflammable' have the same meaning! This language is insane!"
GIVE ME COFFEE AND I WILL ALLOW YOU TO LIVE!- Frigid
"Ork 'as no automatic code o' survival. 'is partic'lar distinction from all udda livin' gits is tha necessity ta act inna face o' alternatives by means o' dakka."
I created the sound of madness, wrote the book on pain
User avatar
LadyTevar
Pleasure Kitten Foreman
Posts: 13197
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2006 8:25 pm
18
Location: In your lap, purring
Contact:

#330 Re: Star Trek: The Quadratic War

Post by LadyTevar »

oh... shit...

Ok, do NOT do that again, Josh. You wrecked 3 ships that way, and probably lit up that part of the Badlands with a massive X-ray burst from the quasi-wormhole you just created.
Image

Dogs are Man's Best Friend
Cats are Man's Adorable Little Serial Killers
User avatar
Josh
Resident of the Kingdom of Eternal Cockjobbery
Posts: 8114
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 4:51 pm
19
Location: Kingdom of Eternal Cockjobbery

#331 Re: Star Trek: The Quadratic War

Post by Josh »

'Wrecked' is a bit harsh, perhaps. Two of the three are still in some sort of function and the Klingons are still in shape to shoot shit up.

Besides, isn't friendly-firing the Riskadh part of the initiation these days?

(Shirazi won't ever do that again unless it's some huge dramatic last sacrifice kinda deal, don't worry.)
When the Frog God smiles, arm yourself.
"'Flammable' and 'inflammable' have the same meaning! This language is insane!"
GIVE ME COFFEE AND I WILL ALLOW YOU TO LIVE!- Frigid
"Ork 'as no automatic code o' survival. 'is partic'lar distinction from all udda livin' gits is tha necessity ta act inna face o' alternatives by means o' dakka."
I created the sound of madness, wrote the book on pain
User avatar
Comrade Tortoise
Exemplar
Posts: 4832
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 1:33 am
19
Location: Land of steers and queers indeed
Contact:

#332 Re: Star Trek: The Quadratic War

Post by Comrade Tortoise »

THAT ROCKED.

We need to figure out how to weaponize that.
As it happens, there IS a ship who's crew has experience in the design and testing of subspace weaponry.

Image
"Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution."
- Theodosius Dobzhansky

There is no word harsh enough for this. No verbal edge sharp and cold enough to set forth the flaying needed. English is to young and the elder languages of the earth beyond me. ~Frigid

The Holocaust was an Amazing Logistical Achievement~Havoc
User avatar
General Havoc
Mr. Party-Killbot
Posts: 5245
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 2:12 pm
19
Location: The City that is not Frisco
Contact:

#333 Re: Star Trek: The Quadratic War

Post by General Havoc »

Much as I enjoy these wild interpolations from canon about what level of firepower these ships have, I'll remind you all that my policy remains one of complete indifference to what is and is not canon insofar as it affects my capacity to run this game properly. Sudden "discoveries" of canonical material that arbitrarily multiplies your ships' firepower by factors of seven will be met by sudden "discoveries" of irreparable breaches in your ships' warp containment fields. I am serious about this.

I have no problem with the Akira as a torpedo boat of noteworthy effectiveness. I have a major problem with the sudden discovery that they can project three times the firepower of a heavy battlecruiser based on the examination of some model. Bear all this in mind as you decide what your ships can and cannot do.
Last edited by General Havoc on Mon Aug 05, 2013 5:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Gaze upon my works, ye mighty, and despair...

Havoc: "So basically if you side against him, he summons Cthulu."
Hotfoot: "Yes, which is reasonable."
User avatar
Comrade Tortoise
Exemplar
Posts: 4832
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 1:33 am
19
Location: Land of steers and queers indeed
Contact:

#334 Re: Star Trek: The Quadratic War

Post by Comrade Tortoise »

Lys wrote:
Comrade Tortoise wrote:An Akira? Yes. Yes I do. Even the carrier version of an Akira has a very heavy weapons load. You might be a light cruiser, but you have a vast torpedoe arsenal and enough phasers to give my beam boat a good contest. I could take one, but probably not two at once. You can take both if they stay and fight.
Every version of the Akira is the carrier version, it's both a carrier and a torpedo boat, or rather a long-range fire support ship. Like the Defiant class, it's probably built as a warship making it very strong pound for pound, but its beam armament is still just for self-defence. There's only three phaser strips, one large one on the top saucer, and two smaller ones on the bottom saucer, with no rear coverage.

Though, DS9 TM does list it as having six phaser arrays. It's not wholly unreasonable, but i'm not sure where exactly would you put them, as the ship's already kind of crowded with armaments. Maybe two of them on trailing edge of the nacelle pylons to give it some rear coverage, and the sixth... no idea. That the extra three arrays would make it a better contender for close in engagements, but at that point you're might be pushing the limits of what the ship can do. A lot of its internal space is already taken up by the flight deck and torpedo magazines, which makes it difficult to add extra phaser arrays and the attendant capacitors and power conduits. Could be either way, though.
Keep in mind that a larger ship might have fewer phaser arrays, but the arrays can have more individual emitters that colaminate their beams in various configurations. A HUGE phaser array can let loose a more powerful beam than a smaller array, or a series of less powerful beams.

That said, two dorsal and two ventral arrays on the primary hull (they look like one on the dorsal arc, but it is actually two that converge), and there are two on the aft sail.

The discrepancy in the launcher numbers is the number of tubes per launcher. Two launchers, 5 tubes each.

When you compare this to something like a Sovereign, the battlecruiser has more larger phaser arrays, though there are more coverage gaps at close range etc. There are the same number of torpedo launchers but... well a Sov is firing off quantums and mount the next generation of launchers, which have a faster rate of fire.
"Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution."
- Theodosius Dobzhansky

There is no word harsh enough for this. No verbal edge sharp and cold enough to set forth the flaying needed. English is to young and the elder languages of the earth beyond me. ~Frigid

The Holocaust was an Amazing Logistical Achievement~Havoc
User avatar
Josh
Resident of the Kingdom of Eternal Cockjobbery
Posts: 8114
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 4:51 pm
19
Location: Kingdom of Eternal Cockjobbery

#335 Re: Star Trek: The Quadratic War

Post by Josh »

Comrade Tortoise wrote:As it happens, there IS a ship who's crew has experience in the design and testing of subspace weaponry.
YES!

Somebody who appreciates my love of making the universe divide by zero.
General Havoc wrote:Bear all this in mind as you decide what your ships can and cannot do.
Right now mine can leak air and fly slowly in a straight line.
When the Frog God smiles, arm yourself.
"'Flammable' and 'inflammable' have the same meaning! This language is insane!"
GIVE ME COFFEE AND I WILL ALLOW YOU TO LIVE!- Frigid
"Ork 'as no automatic code o' survival. 'is partic'lar distinction from all udda livin' gits is tha necessity ta act inna face o' alternatives by means o' dakka."
I created the sound of madness, wrote the book on pain
User avatar
Lys
Master
Posts: 1896
Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 7:37 pm
13

#336 Re: Star Trek: The Quadratic War

Post by Lys »

General Havoc wrote:I have no problem with the Akira as a torpedo boat of noteworthy effectiveness. I have a major problem with the sudden discovery that they can project three times the firepower of a heavy battlecruiser based on the examination of some model. Bear all this in mind as you decide what your ships can and cannot do.
Let us back up a little:
Lys, Pg. 6 wrote:[1/2 ptorp missile warheads] gives me a 24 P-torp equivalent alpha strike.A stock Sovereign can hit with the equivalent of a 32 torpedo alpha strike: 5 forward photon launchers, 1 forward quantum launcher, four shots per launcher, 20 P-torps and 4 Q-torps, 1 Q-torp = 3 P-torps, total is equivalent to 32 P-torps.
General Havoc, Pg. 6 wrote:Yes, your missiles comparable to the theoretical throw-weight of a Sovereign-class Battlecruiser
Lys, Pg. 13 wrote:...since torpedoes have some manoeuvrability, at long range you should be able to use your side launchers for targets ahead of you. Judging by the Akira's size and number of tubes they're probably double-firing. So that's ten photon torpedo tubes and two quantum, meaning 24 torpedoes, four of them quantum. If you can't use the side launchers it drops to 16 torpedoes, four of them quantum.
What i'm suggesting is an Akira has the same maximum torpedo throw-weight as Sovereign at long range, if the side launchers can be used. It's less if not, less at close range either way, and with only three phaser arrays to back it up in comparison to the Sovereign's sixteen. In my view, that's eminently reasonable for an artillery-focused warship about 3/5 the size of the Sovereign, that has none of its mission flexibility, but does have a flight deck instead. The guy designing the model knew what he was doing, because in my view he nailed the sucker. It's a powerful fire support ship, but if unescorted it will still get murdered by frigates and destroyers, or smashed aside by battlecruisers. It was only brought up because, as CyniCat said, the Akira's stats have been all over the place online and i got an interest in figuring the puzzle out, so it's been in my mind.

Now you might have a different view of how much do phasers contribute to overall fire-power versus torpedoes. If it's less then the 13 phaser array difference becomes less important, if it's more it becomes more important. If you think the Sovie's torpedo-strike estimate is too high, then the Akira's estimate is too high too. The argument for "three times the firepower of a heavy battlecruiser" is not one i would advance. Still as you say General Havoc, you're the final arbiter, not going to contest that, i just got excited about figuring some stuff out and wanted to share is all.

Anyway, posting soon, Khanjar's got to have detected that huge ass subspace tear, so she'll be showing up.
Lys is lily, or lilium.
The pretty flowers remind me of a song of elves.
User avatar
Cynical Cat
Arch-Magician
Posts: 11930
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 8:53 pm
19
Location: Ice Sarcophagus outside a ruined Jedi Temple
Contact:

#337 Re: Star Trek: The Quadratic War

Post by Cynical Cat »

The Akira is 3/5th the lengths of the Sovereign, not 3/5th the size.
It's not that I'm unforgiving, it's that most of the people who wrong me are unrepentant assholes.
User avatar
General Havoc
Mr. Party-Killbot
Posts: 5245
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 2:12 pm
19
Location: The City that is not Frisco
Contact:

#338 Re: Star Trek: The Quadratic War

Post by General Havoc »

My example of three times the firepower of a heavy battlecruiser was not a direct accusation, it was an illustration of the sorts of revelations I am going to be inclined to reject wholesale, irrespective of "evidence". I have no objection to people getting the maximum out of their ships, but sudden "discoveries" of some obscure element of canon that drastically multiplies the the power of one's ship are not acceptable, not even when blessed by canon. I have been clear about this since the beginning of the game and will remain so. There is no consistency to Star Trek canon, and everything is up to interpretation. I do not want to get into a fight sixty pages down the line where someone "uncovers" the fact that their class of ship happens to have a Tricobalt launcher with fifty rounds in it standard, or that their weapons' fire rate is actually triple what it was up until that point.

I have allowed everyone to have very powerful ships outfitted with literally anything you want, and I fully intend for you to get more powerful still. But it will be at a pace I set, not one established by some sudden discovery of a fragment of canon.
Gaze upon my works, ye mighty, and despair...

Havoc: "So basically if you side against him, he summons Cthulu."
Hotfoot: "Yes, which is reasonable."
User avatar
Marcao
Disciple
Posts: 751
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 7:46 pm
18
Contact:

#339 Re: Star Trek: The Quadratic War

Post by Marcao »

Heading out to the DomRep for two weeks. Cynical Cat and Hotfoot have full posting privileges while I am gone. Rhoenix has limited posting privileges thanks to the background between our ships.
The Peddler of Half Truths.
"Not OP, therefore weakest." - Cynical Cat (May 2016)
"A dog doesn’t need to show his teeth as long as his growl’s deep enough, his food bowl is full and he knows where all the bones are buried." - Frank Underwood
User avatar
General Havoc
Mr. Party-Killbot
Posts: 5245
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 2:12 pm
19
Location: The City that is not Frisco
Contact:

#340 Re: Star Trek: The Quadratic War

Post by General Havoc »

Marcao wrote:Heading out to the DomRep for two weeks. Cynical Cat and Hotfoot have full posting privileges while I am gone. Rhoenix has limited posting privileges thanks to the background between our ships.
Thanks for the PM's, Marcao. I'll integrate those into the next set of updates. Have fun in the Caribbean!
Gaze upon my works, ye mighty, and despair...

Havoc: "So basically if you side against him, he summons Cthulu."
Hotfoot: "Yes, which is reasonable."
User avatar
White Haven
Disciple
Posts: 752
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 10:45 am
18
Location: Richmond Virginia, the Capitol of Treason
Contact:

#341 Re: Star Trek: The Quadratic War

Post by White Haven »

I made a few assumptions to get things moving, Havoc; let me know if anything wouldn't be playing out as I posted and we'll work out the results. I didn't want to end up in a split-timeline situation as a result of one situation not moving ahead in time with the other.
ImageImageChronological Incontinence: Time warps around the poster. The thread topic winks out of existence and reappears in 1d10 posts.

Out of Context Theatre, this week starring rhoenix
-'I need to hit the can, but if you wouldn't mind joining me for number two, I'd be grateful.'
User avatar
Josh
Resident of the Kingdom of Eternal Cockjobbery
Posts: 8114
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 4:51 pm
19
Location: Kingdom of Eternal Cockjobbery

#342 Re: Star Trek: The Quadratic War

Post by Josh »

Admittedly it was written fifteen minutes before a client came in, but I apologize for Yhrea's tortuously long run-on sentence. He was speaking from the heart.
When the Frog God smiles, arm yourself.
"'Flammable' and 'inflammable' have the same meaning! This language is insane!"
GIVE ME COFFEE AND I WILL ALLOW YOU TO LIVE!- Frigid
"Ork 'as no automatic code o' survival. 'is partic'lar distinction from all udda livin' gits is tha necessity ta act inna face o' alternatives by means o' dakka."
I created the sound of madness, wrote the book on pain
User avatar
Lys
Master
Posts: 1896
Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 7:37 pm
13

#343 Re: Star Trek: The Quadratic War

Post by Lys »

Ugh, how the fuck is it that i managed to spend three days only managing to write while sleep deprived? Going to be pleasantly surprised if i'm happy with my game thread post after getting some rest. It took way too long for a mere 1000 words, and i'm not very happy with it now.

Anyway, the post requires some commentary. Firstly and most importantly, the Khanjar's meant to be a famous ship throughout the Alpha Quadrant. Her showing up is momentous on the level of the Enterprise showing up, and there should be some expectation of General Denkara to be aboard just the same as one would expect Admiral Picard aboard Enterprise. Of course given that Khanjar's signature is going to be all fucked up from all the Romulan and Mirakian stuff crammed into her, and that she's painted neon blue of all things, complete disbelief that it actually is Khanjar would not be unexpected. Basically, imagine that a Federation ship in all the wrong colours and with a Romulan power signature shows up claiming to be the Enterprise, and then when you talk to its Captain she's some Romulan you don't know. That's about what my ship showing up is like at this point, which Ishtar is aware of and is why she's neglecting to introduce herself for now.

Secondly, Ishtar isn't actually singing an early 21st century Russo-Japanese song, just the same as she isn't actually speaking in English when i write her dialogue in English. What i'm doing is translating the culture much the same as we translate the language. In the post she's singing a Romulan song, written by Romulans, for Romulans, in Romulan. This song is a lot like Rise, hence why it's translated as Rise, but is not actually it. The same will hold true for pretty much any other verse she might indulge in, unless the text explicitly states otherwise.

General Havoc wrote:I have allowed everyone to have very powerful ships outfitted with literally anything you want, and I fully intend for you to get more powerful still. But it will be at a pace I set, not one established by some sudden discovery of a fragment of canon.
Making Akiras more powerful by some fragment of cannon wasn't really my intention, it's not even my ship! What's actually my ship doesn't even have any canon. Just, it was cool to me that examining the model and making some reasonable assumptions yielded exactly the level of fire-power i thought it should have to begin with. Then i got excited about it and wound up running off at the mouth.
Cynical Cat wrote:The Akira is 3/5th the lengths of the Sovereign, not 3/5th the size.
For similar three dimensional objects, 3/5th the length implies 1/5th the volume, yes. However, the Akira and Sovereign are not at all proportionally similar objects. The Akira is way beefier than the Sovie is relative its length. Really, it should be obvious when you realize that the Akira's saucer is just as wide as the Sovie's saucer, and then begin to compare their respective secondary structures. What really makes it jump into contrast, though, is making the two ships have the same length. At that point it becomes obvious the Akira is nearly three times the size of a same-length Sovie. Thus the Akira manages to be 3/5th in length and volume to the full size Sovereign.
Akira Sovereign comparison.jpg
Akira Sovereign comparison.jpg (209.97 KiB) Viewed 3425 times
Suddenly it occurs to me that the weight class chart back at page one could do with the Constitution and Akira switching places, given the Akira's like six times larger. Heck, drop the Connie all the way to frigate and bump the modern Steamrunner to light cruiser. The Miranda's a frigate and the Connie's pretty much the same size, they belong together.

And now i'm running off at the mouth again. >_>
Lys is lily, or lilium.
The pretty flowers remind me of a song of elves.
User avatar
Cynical Cat
Arch-Magician
Posts: 11930
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 8:53 pm
19
Location: Ice Sarcophagus outside a ruined Jedi Temple
Contact:

#344 Re: Star Trek: The Quadratic War

Post by Cynical Cat »

No Lys, it isn't. The respective secondary structures are a weapon pod for the Akira and the engineering section for the Sovereign, which a top down view doesn't accurately convey. Half the Akira's length is purely made up of warp nacelle's and pylons. The Akira's secondary structures are in fact, far less beefy. Making the Akira the Sovereign's length is a complete distortion. And that's before we get into the little fact that it's wide saucer is only as wide as the Sovereign's skinny one and that its entire length, including pylons, is barely longer than the Sovereign's solid saucer.
It's not that I'm unforgiving, it's that most of the people who wrong me are unrepentant assholes.
User avatar
General Havoc
Mr. Party-Killbot
Posts: 5245
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 2:12 pm
19
Location: The City that is not Frisco
Contact:

#345 Re: Star Trek: The Quadratic War

Post by General Havoc »

As before, I'm fine with trying to understand the ships better, but I am not changing the fundamental nature of people's ships based on some estimation from semi-canonical guesswork. One can use the ever-shifting nature of Star Trek canon to "redefine" a D'Deridex into an Escort Destroyer if one is inclined to stretch enough.

The categories I posted in the beginning of the OOC thread are there specifically to give you guys an idea of how I will be treating these various ships, and what capacities I intend to endow them with. When I describe a ship as a Heavy Cruiser, or whatever else, I mean a specific set of things by that description, things I expect you and your crews already know. The Connie is an old Medium Cruiser, small by today's standards, but I will be treating it, should one show up, like a Medium Cruiser, as that was how it was intended to function, and that is how it still functions now. If I change it into a Frigate simply based on today's standards, that implies an entirely different set of expected behaviors. You would all cry foul if I had Connies (even refit ones) zooming about like Jem Hadar Attack Ships, I should expect.

Obviously, even within classification categories, there's a lot of difference, as a Defiant and a Bird of Prey are not the same ship, despite both being Destroyers. Your ships can (and will) break the rules in some regard, as many have pointed out and will continue to. But the list represents how those ships approximately behave by default and how they will be used, both by NPC ships, and by me in evaluating how your ships respond to given circumstances. If you are in a Light Cruiser, and you decide to go toe to toe with a Battlecruiser, all of the canon-pointing in the world will not save you if I decide your shields are stove in by repeated broadsides of heavy power. I have given everyone notice as to how your ships work within the confines of this game. I won't change them out from under someone because of some estimation.

The Akira is, by my definition and every bit of evidence I've seen, a Light Cruiser. It was a Light Cruiser when Tev picked it, and it remains one now, and in a hundred more pages of IC canon it will still be a Light Cruiser. It may be a large Light Cruiser or a well-armed Light Cruiser, but it is still a Light Cruiser, and changing that designation means more than just altering the nomenclature.
Gaze upon my works, ye mighty, and despair...

Havoc: "So basically if you side against him, he summons Cthulu."
Hotfoot: "Yes, which is reasonable."
User avatar
Josh
Resident of the Kingdom of Eternal Cockjobbery
Posts: 8114
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 4:51 pm
19
Location: Kingdom of Eternal Cockjobbery

#346 Re: Star Trek: The Quadratic War

Post by Josh »

Added bio briefs for tr'Valdran and Peenostinga to the bio thread.
When the Frog God smiles, arm yourself.
"'Flammable' and 'inflammable' have the same meaning! This language is insane!"
GIVE ME COFFEE AND I WILL ALLOW YOU TO LIVE!- Frigid
"Ork 'as no automatic code o' survival. 'is partic'lar distinction from all udda livin' gits is tha necessity ta act inna face o' alternatives by means o' dakka."
I created the sound of madness, wrote the book on pain
User avatar
Lys
Master
Posts: 1896
Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 7:37 pm
13

#347 Re: Star Trek: The Quadratic War

Post by Lys »

When I describe a ship as a Heavy Cruiser, or whatever else, I mean a specific set of things by that description, things I expect you and your crews already know. The Connie is an old Medium Cruiser, small by today's standards, but I will be treating it, should one show up, like a Medium Cruiser, as that was how it was intended to function, and that is how it still functions now. If I change it into a Frigate simply based on today's standards, that implies an entirely different set of expected behaviors. You would all cry foul if I had Connies (even refit ones) zooming about like Jem Hadar Attack Ships, I should expect
Oh, well you downgraded the Connie to medium cruiser from heavy cruiser, and the Miranda to frigate from either medium or heavy cruiser (never stated on screen which), so i figured you were dropping the older ones down in weight class. It's just weird to me to not have the Miranda and Connie in the same category, or with the Miranda just one category lower. They're about the same size and we saw them evenly matched in Wrath of Khan. But then, we do see Mirandas zooming around like Jem'hadar bugs, which is why two of them were running escort on the Defiant during... Sacrifice of Angels was it? i've not actually watched DS9, just YouTube clips. Maybe they refitted the thing with more powerful engines so it could fill the frigate role, and the Connie was taken out of service because it could not be so refitted and was too small to fill any other role?
Cynical Cat wrote:No Lys, it isn't. The respective secondary structures are a weapon pod for the Akira and the engineering section for the Sovereign, which a top down view doesn't accurately convey. Half the Akira's length is purely made up of warp nacelle's and pylons. The Akira's secondary structures are in fact, far less beefy. Making the Akira the Sovereign's length is a complete distortion. And that's before we get into the little fact that it's wide saucer is only as wide as the Sovereign's skinny one and that its entire length, including pylons, is barely longer than the Sovereign's solid saucer.
If we shrink down the Sovereign to 440 metres, we know for a fact that this Little-Sovie is just over 1/5 the volume of the original sized Big-Sovie, because that's how geometry works. Then if we observe that the Akira is not quite three times the volume of a Little-Sovie, and it clearly is so as seen in those pictures, then by multiplication we get a total Akira volume of nearly 3/5 a Big-Sovie. Are you really arguing that the an Akira is not more than twice as large than an object which is objectively 1/5 the size of a Sovereign? Because honestly i don't know how else to interpret the visual evidence, the head-on view in particular is rather telling. Here's the side view below, though it obscures the rather striking difference in width.
Sovereign Akira comparison.jpg
Sovereign Akira comparison.jpg (174.59 KiB) Viewed 3401 times
Taking all the views together we can observe that the Akie's superstructure struts are each nearly the size of the Little-Sovie's engineering section, while the Akie's own engineering section is a bit over half as large. The Akie's saucer is just as thick, slightly longer, and twice as wide. The nacelles and pylons are all a fair bit brawnier, and the Sovie's got no equivalent structure for the weapons pod. If you will not see that the Akira is close to three times the size of the Little-Sovie, which is undeniably 1/5 the size of the Big-Sovie, then we have nothing more to discuss, as there is no point in arguing each other's perceptions.
Lys is lily, or lilium.
The pretty flowers remind me of a song of elves.
User avatar
General Havoc
Mr. Party-Killbot
Posts: 5245
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 2:12 pm
19
Location: The City that is not Frisco
Contact:

#348 Re: Star Trek: The Quadratic War

Post by General Havoc »

Lys wrote:Oh, well you downgraded the Connie to medium cruiser from heavy cruiser, and the Miranda to frigate from either medium or heavy cruiser (never stated on screen which), so i figured you were dropping the older ones down in weight class. It's just weird to me to not have the Miranda and Connie in the same category, or with the Miranda just one category lower. They're about the same size and we saw them evenly matched in Wrath of Khan. But then, we do see Mirandas zooming around like Jem'hadar bugs, which is why two of them were running escort on the Defiant during... Sacrifice of Angels was it? i've not actually watched DS9, just YouTube clips. Maybe they refitted the thing with more powerful engines so it could fill the frigate role, and the Connie was taken out of service because it could not be so refitted and was too small to fill any other role?
If you really want my rationale on those decisions...

The Constitution and Miranda classes date from an earlier time in Starfleet, when there were fewer overall classes of ships (at least ones we know about), and the stylistic and structural parallels to the Age of Sail were considerably more prominent than they later became. Not that Star Trek ever got completely away from those traditions, but by the DS9 era, the feel had definitely become more WWIIish, what with Escort Destroyers and massive fleets of hundreds of ships, including squadrons of carrier-launched fighters. It therefore stands to reason that the concept of what a ship-of-the-line is would have changed over time.

When the Connies were flying around, there was no distinction in Starfleet between a "Heavy" or "Light" (let alone "Battle") cruiser, a ship of the line was a ship of the line, as in Nelson's day, and the Constitution was thus rated a "Cruiser" without comment (yes, I know all about the Royal Navy's 'rating' system, but there is no evidence nor any compelling reason that Starfleet would have needed an equivalent). The Miranda, a smaller vessel, yet clearly still a ship capable of projecting potent, independent force, was rated as a "Frigate", the old Royal Navy term for a ship that was a step down from a Ship-of-the-Line, but still entirely capable of mounting independent operations (see the Aubrey-Martin books for a good example thereof). Had the concept of a "Light" cruiser existed at the time, Miranda might well have been rated as such, but the traditions of the Starfleet were those of the old Royal Navy in the days of Napoleon and Trafalgar (Star Trek II is clear enough on this, to say nothing of everything else), and the terminology used was derived therefrom.

But times changed, and new classes of ship emerged. For a while it was simple enough to simply call anything that was intended to replace the Constitution (Excelsior for instance) a Cruiser, and anything intended to replace the Miranda (Oberth for instance) a Frigate. But as generations of ships went by, and Starfleet began building more and more classes of more and more varied ships, the blanket term of "Cruiser" became less and less helpful in determining just what a ship was. If 80% of your vessels are "Cruisers", scattered within a dozen different classes with a dozen different mission parameters, then the term is no longer of any use. Accordingly, the super-heavy vessels that Starfleet (and others) began building before and during the TNG era, ships considerably larger and more powerful than a Constitution was, even when accounting for the age of the various vessels, became "Heavy" cruisers, while the smaller vessels, large enough to rate as cruisers, yet not designed as heavy vessels of the line, became "Light" cruisers. As time went on, the "Heavy" designation bifurcated even further as Starfleet began facing more overt military threats that demanded a more overt military response, thus spinning off the hyper-armed gutpunchers of the fleet into the "Battlecruiser" designation, while retaining the stately omnipurpose flag vessels in the Heavy designation.

The older Federation vessels, the Connies and Excelsiors and the like, remained Cruisers, for that was what they were built as, and one does not, ever, for any reason, "demote" a ship in rank simply because bigger ships have been built (which is why the First Rates of the old Nelsonian fleets had no cap to the number of guns they could carry). However, being as the generic "Cruiser" designation they had used was now split into many categories, none of which they legitimately fit into, the decision was made to simply reclassify them all as "Medium" cruisers. You will note that, with the exception of the Nebula class (a weird vessel I could legitimately place in any one of three categories), all of the "standard" or "Medium" cruisers I cited are all either legacy vessels (including Klingon ones), or the ships of second-tier powers whose shipbuilding capacities were such that they could not reliably construct ships large enough to warrant classification as Heavy or Light. The Galor and Keldon classes, for instance, are more modern ships, but thanks to the congenital defects of Cardassian ship design (I cite basically all of DS9), classifying them as anything above a medium cruiser is simply unrealistic, whereas they are clearly not designed as Light Cruisers in function or intended role. Medium Cruiser thus became, for Starfleet, a sort of catchall term for older, refitted ships from an earlier era, ships designed to stand in the line, but for whom the line had grown considerably more teeth than it had possessed in their day.

As to the Mirandas, they remained classified as Frigates, just as the Connies did as Cruisers. But unlike the Connies, the designation of "Frigate" did not split up as much as the "Cruiser" did. Frigates, however advanced, remained what they were even in the Miranda's time, smaller, more limited vessels still more than capable of undertaking their own independent operations, but not expected to stand in the direct line of battle and pound away. In the Dominion War, the Mirandas were indeed used to do that, with predictable results, but the succeeding classes of Frigate, however more advanced, did not really alter from that model. What changed was the scale of the other vessels in the galaxy. The worst a Miranda might previously have been expected to run into was a D-7 or the equivalent, but by DS9's time, you have D'Deridex, Vorcha, and even Negh'var classes flying around, as well as their Federation equivalents. As ever-more lofty designations were invented for those scale of ships, the Miranda and the other Frigates found themselves outmatched by not one but many weight-classes of ship, but per the tradition before, they were not downgraded to "cutters" or "corvettes" or whatever else, but retained the name Frigate, even if the concept of what a Frigate was had changed somewhat since their heyday. This is why Miranda-class Frigates, which were capable of holding their own against Constitution-class Cruisers, were being swatted out of the sky by Jem'Hadar Battlecruisers. The level of firepower these ships were classified against was simply orders of magnitudes higher, necessitating a revision of just what a Frigate was and was not capable of doing.

The only class to divide off from the Frigate was, of course, the Destroyer, a term that did not exist in the Napoelonic age, and which the unwarlike Federation never properly embraced at all. Nevertheless, once the decision was made to construct purpose-built escort warships, fast, maneuverable, and packed with firepower, it was clear that something other than Frigate would be needed to classify them. The Federation used the term "Escort" for a while, but Destroyer is a term I believe to be more in keeping with the more modern conception of Star Trek embodied by DS9 and the like, one derived from the WWII-era navy, mixed with the old traditions of Napoleon. As a Defiant class, for instance, despite also being a small vessel, is both designed for and employed in a role completely alien to those of the Mirandas and other Frigates, it seemed the logical choice.

So that is why I have classified the Constitution as a Medium Cruiser and the Miranda as a Frigate. These designations reflect the roles for which they were constructed back when Starfleet was smaller and their classifications less diverse. There are of course, modern ships classified as Frigates (and a few classified as Medium Cruisers), but this is because they are intended for roles similar to those undertaken by the original ships who first embodied that classification, unlike those vessels in more modern ones.
Gaze upon my works, ye mighty, and despair...

Havoc: "So basically if you side against him, he summons Cthulu."
Hotfoot: "Yes, which is reasonable."
User avatar
Lys
Master
Posts: 1896
Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 7:37 pm
13

#349 Re: Star Trek: The Quadratic War

Post by Lys »

Thanks for elaborating Havoc, that's rather enlightening. It seems you have strung together a large overarching narrative with respect to ship classifications. It also explains why you make the Akira a light cruiser and not a medium cruiser. You see, i was looking at the classification list as weight classes, much the same as you divide prize fighters into weight classes, with ship role being a secondary consideration. You've now made it evident to me that the classification is actually by role, with ship size a secondary consideration. This very much like US Navy designations in the guided missile era (mid-1950s to present). In that case yes the Akira is a light cruiser even if it considerably out-masses the other ships you've put in the same category. It's not a medium-cruiser because that designation is reserved for either quirky multi-roles or legacy designs. The Akira is neither, even if it stands good odds of blowing every one but the Nebula out of the sky. (The Nebula would likely tank the Akira's torpedoes and then beat it to death.)

Now since we're making age of sail references, to me the comparison between the Miranda and the Constitution is like the comparison between two different third rates. The former is like a 68 gun third-rate and the latter like a 74 gun third-rate. Clearly one is smaller than the other, but the difference isn't large, and you wouldn't ever rate a 68-gun anything but a ship-of-the-line. Same case for the Miranda, i would hesitate to call it a frigate by the age of sail standard when it's so closely matched to the not-a-frigate Constitution. What i would do is either stick it with the medium cruisers like the other legacy ships, or else take the explanation that they were all refitted with bigger engines to take the frigate role. While they're not very durable, they do consistently show pretty good manoeuvrability in DS9 that seems absent in Wrath of Khan.
Lys is lily, or lilium.
The pretty flowers remind me of a song of elves.
User avatar
Comrade Tortoise
Exemplar
Posts: 4832
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 1:33 am
19
Location: Land of steers and queers indeed
Contact:

#350 Re: Star Trek: The Quadratic War

Post by Comrade Tortoise »

Point of information
The Miranda never went Toe to Toe on equal footing with a Connie. The Reliant bushwhacked the Enterprise with her shields down, and then managed to withstand a few phaser shots (as opposed to the phasers and multiple torpedo hits the unshielded Enterprise took) with heavy-moderate damage. Then got pasted all over the Mutara nebula later.

There is absolutely no comparison between the two. Yeah, a couple of them might be able to gang up on a constitution class and win, but one on one it is absolutely no contest.
"Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution."
- Theodosius Dobzhansky

There is no word harsh enough for this. No verbal edge sharp and cold enough to set forth the flaying needed. English is to young and the elder languages of the earth beyond me. ~Frigid

The Holocaust was an Amazing Logistical Achievement~Havoc
Post Reply