LadyTevar wrote:Guys? Can we just drop it an move on with the RP?
I don't think it is hostile or anything at this point (right guys?), I'm curious in settling the explosion details as I don't know everything.
Besides, I already posted this round's RPing. Now I have to wait for the others to move. :)
sharkbait wrote:1. yes your equations are right they are excellent and well researched i bow to you for your thoroughness, however in gunpowder explosions the problem is it needs to be packed tightly to explode all of the powder. If not then the powder continues to burn but is thrown away from the center of the explosion making a bigger fireball but a slower explosion reducing the pressure wave.
True enough in general. I am uncertain what the difference in effect would be between a properly packed 200 kg charge of loose black powder and 200 kg of corned black powder within a sealed barrel. Obviously the second case is still contained, just how effectively it approximates the sort of containment needed for a maximal explosion is beyond my knowledge. I assume it to be close to maximal, mostly because it is corned powder, which actually burns
faster than packed loose powder (which is why it was adopted--once they made guns that could take the pressure).
sharkbait wrote:My point was one of the description in game of my injuries lead me to believe i was capable of movement. and thinking that the powder was just that powder sloshing around in the keg that had 20% of its volume filled with air.
On this point I think a very simple misunderstanding involving a line of missed description is at blame:
Charon wrote:Dirt and wood bounced off of the troll's armor as arrows would. Per remained conscious, but his world was a blur and he was in no condition to right himself.
(emphasis mine) This is not intended to be an insensitive "hur hur you should have seen this" sort of statement but it does look like you missed this line.
sharkbait wrote:2. Side note, bricks don't burn faster, combustion is a chemical reaction, and powders will always react faster than bricks, powder has more surface area more surface area means faster burning which is why fires in flour mills are so dangerous they have a tendency to explode.
Correct under certain circumstances. Powders have >>> more surface area than solid chunks do, yes. However a packed mass of flour presents a surface area to the oxygen around it roughly equivalent to the surface area of a solid mass of the same dimensions as the packed flour.
(Air-borne flour is very explosive because it is fully aerated. Flour in a bag is nearly impossible to set aflame because it only presents the same surface area as an object of the same dimensions as the flour bag.)
However, black powder is a self-sustaining reaction, providing its own oxygen, so things work a little differently. That said it turns out that bricks of powder (corned powder) do in fact burn faster than loose powder--packed or otherwise. Here's why:
Black powder's burning reaction travels through a solid mass of the material at less than the speed of sound (a deflagration wave) by thermally heating the material adjacent to the reaction. This is characteristic of all low explosives. High explosives, such as TNT, burn differently. In these explosives the reaction propagates through the solid material at the speed of sound (for that material) as the shock wave compressively heats the material it passes through (a detonation wave). Basically, if you have a solid, uniform rod shaped mass of black powder and light one side of the rod the reaction will travel through the mass relatively slowly as the burning part heats and lights the part next to it, until all the mass is burned. A similar rod of TNT will burn far faster as the shock from the initial reaction at one end travels into the material at the speed of sound and compressively heats and lights the material it passes through. Much faster, hence the bigger boom.
Knowing that the black powder reaction is rather slow is helpful in understanding the benefit of corning. When black powder is burned solid chunks of (very hot) salts are formed which are ejected every which way as might be expected. Where they land they have the potential to light more powder and start the slow-moving burning process in a different location. Corning, by making chunks of powder, leaves gaps between these chunks which allow the passage of these hot salt sparks. So if you have a mass of corned black powder stuffed into, say, a cannon, and you light one end of it, the reaction will produce many sparks. Many of these sparks will travel between the powder chunks inwards towards the center of the charge, lighting more chunks as they go. This wave of sparks travels faster than the deflagration wave, and the result is you get more powder burning over a given interval than you could if it were a tightly packed loose powder.
(note: I say "tightly packed loose powder" to mean taking a loose powder and then tightly packing it so that it is no longer loose. This is opposed to "corned powder" which refers to a collection of large chunks of "powder" and cannot actually be tightly packed into anything without crumbling those chunks.)
The end result is that, yes, bricks of black powder do burn faster than a powder does (that's why we use it that way).
<><><><><>
sharkbait wrote:BBQ bricks are used because they burn more slowly and evenly giving a consistent heat over time so you don't have to keep adding and removing coals/fuel. but this is a side not not important to game
If you spread out ground charcoal it should burn faster than those bricks. But if you dump it in a pile, and pack it so that it isn't aerated (I should have specified the packing before, mea culpa), it should burn more slowly than a similar mass of bricks.
<><><><><>
Any mistakes? I'm learning this as I go and I'm bound to make mistakes.