Veto Power and Line-Item Veto
Moderator: frigidmagi
-
- Initiate
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 9:42 pm
- 17
- Location: Repatriated
- Contact:
#1 Veto Power and Line-Item Veto
To be honest, I'm not sure if this would belong more in the Politics forum, but here goes:
Assuming a system of constitutional government similar to that of the United States, if the executive had the power of line-item veto (that is, to veto an item or group of items from a list of provisions in a bill, while accepting the remaining provisions and signing them into law), would it tilt the balance of power too far in the executive's favor?
Assuming a system of constitutional government similar to that of the United States, if the executive had the power of line-item veto (that is, to veto an item or group of items from a list of provisions in a bill, while accepting the remaining provisions and signing them into law), would it tilt the balance of power too far in the executive's favor?
- SirNitram
- The All-Seeing Eye
- Posts: 5178
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 7:13 pm
- 19
- Location: Behind you, duh!
- Contact:
#2
Do we assume an Executive with only the powers granted it by the Constitution, or by the powers of the Executive as it stands now?
As it stands now, especially under Bush, it's too powerful. Even without a Line-Item Veto.
As it stands now, especially under Bush, it's too powerful. Even without a Line-Item Veto.
Half-Damned, All Hero.
Tev: You're happy. You're Plotting. You're Evil.
Me: Evil is so inappropriate. I'm ruthless.
Tev: You're turning me on.
I Am Rage. You Will Know My Fury.
Tev: You're happy. You're Plotting. You're Evil.
Me: Evil is so inappropriate. I'm ruthless.
Tev: You're turning me on.
I Am Rage. You Will Know My Fury.
- Cynical Cat
- Arch-Magician
- Posts: 11930
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 8:53 pm
- 19
- Location: Ice Sarcophagus outside a ruined Jedi Temple
- Contact:
#3
Too powerful.
It's not that I'm unforgiving, it's that most of the people who wrong me are unrepentant assholes.
-
- Initiate
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 9:42 pm
- 17
- Location: Repatriated
- Contact:
#5
Executive with the powers granted to it by the Constitution.SirNitram wrote:Do we assume an Executive with only the powers granted it by the Constitution, or by the powers of the Executive as it stands now?
As it stands now, especially under Bush, it's too powerful. Even without a Line-Item Veto.
- SirNitram
- The All-Seeing Eye
- Posts: 5178
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 7:13 pm
- 19
- Location: Behind you, duh!
- Contact:
#6
A harder call, but I would side against Line-Item-Veto, as it hobbles Congress' power over the purse.Lord Iames Osari wrote:Executive with the powers granted to it by the Constitution.SirNitram wrote:Do we assume an Executive with only the powers granted it by the Constitution, or by the powers of the Executive as it stands now?
As it stands now, especially under Bush, it's too powerful. Even without a Line-Item Veto.
Half-Damned, All Hero.
Tev: You're happy. You're Plotting. You're Evil.
Me: Evil is so inappropriate. I'm ruthless.
Tev: You're turning me on.
I Am Rage. You Will Know My Fury.
Tev: You're happy. You're Plotting. You're Evil.
Me: Evil is so inappropriate. I'm ruthless.
Tev: You're turning me on.
I Am Rage. You Will Know My Fury.
- frigidmagi
- Dragon Death-Marine General
- Posts: 14757
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 11:03 am
- 19
- Location: Alone and unafraid
#7
To put it bluntly if you can't stand the idea of someone you hate with that power, you should consider that no one be granted that power.
"it takes two sides to end a war but only one to start one. And those who do not have swords may still die upon them." Tolken
- Comrade Tortoise
- Exemplar
- Posts: 4832
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 1:33 am
- 19
- Location: Land of steers and queers indeed
- Contact:
#8
What a line-item veto would essentially do is two fold. Neuter congress and rape the minority party.
The legislative branch would be rendered useless because the executive branch would essentially be able to cut out key portions of a bill, like the parts allowing for enforcement, and entire swaths of the budget.
The minority party would get screwed over because the president could line-item veto the portion of the bill they fought hard to get included through compromise, effectively turning us into a one-party state.
The legislative branch would be rendered useless because the executive branch would essentially be able to cut out key portions of a bill, like the parts allowing for enforcement, and entire swaths of the budget.
The minority party would get screwed over because the president could line-item veto the portion of the bill they fought hard to get included through compromise, effectively turning us into a one-party state.
"Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution."
- Theodosius Dobzhansky
There is no word harsh enough for this. No verbal edge sharp and cold enough to set forth the flaying needed. English is to young and the elder languages of the earth beyond me. ~Frigid
The Holocaust was an Amazing Logistical Achievement~Havoc
- Theodosius Dobzhansky
There is no word harsh enough for this. No verbal edge sharp and cold enough to set forth the flaying needed. English is to young and the elder languages of the earth beyond me. ~Frigid
The Holocaust was an Amazing Logistical Achievement~Havoc
-
- Initiate
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 9:42 pm
- 17
- Location: Repatriated
- Contact:
#9
Thanks for your opinions, people.