Search found 36 matches
- Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:31 pm
- Forum: Out of Character
- Topic: New STGOD Ruleset
- Replies: 166
- Views: 43506
- Sun Apr 25, 2010 12:10 am
- Forum: Out of Character
- Topic: New STGOD Ruleset
- Replies: 166
- Views: 43506
- Sat Apr 24, 2010 11:43 pm
- Forum: Out of Character
- Topic: New STGOD Ruleset
- Replies: 166
- Views: 43506
- Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:34 pm
- Forum: Out of Character
- Topic: New STGOD Ruleset
- Replies: 166
- Views: 43506
I have this great idea for an alt-Britain where Victoria is born as Victor and inherits the crowns of England (without catholic Ireland! damn those Stuarts) and Hannover, then spends his reign trying to forge a proper nation out of them. Amongst other stuff. I played a huge session of Mage: The Asce...
- Sat Apr 24, 2010 9:47 pm
- Forum: Out of Character
- Topic: New STGOD Ruleset
- Replies: 166
- Views: 43506
- Mon Dec 14, 2009 6:16 pm
- Forum: Out of Character
- Topic: STGOD! OOC Thread.
- Replies: 598
- Views: 107788
- Wed Nov 18, 2009 12:06 am
- Forum: Out of Character
- Topic: STGOD rules thread
- Replies: 300
- Views: 64422
- Sun Nov 08, 2009 6:50 pm
- Forum: Out of Character
- Topic: STGOD rules thread
- Replies: 300
- Views: 64422
Speaking of tanks, I'd just like to state that in order to comply with the rules, the most advanced tank you have at game start in 1930 and until at least 1935 in our game should be equivalent to or less advanced than the German Panzer II or any other tank built up to 1935/36. Gentlemen (and lady), ...
- Sun Nov 08, 2009 6:29 pm
- Forum: Out of Character
- Topic: STGOD?
- Replies: 365
- Views: 93631
- Sun Nov 08, 2009 5:06 pm
- Forum: Out of Character
- Topic: STGOD rules thread
- Replies: 300
- Views: 64422
So our tech will permit some consideration, with development, of having an army we can use to charge across flat land while Sabaton "Panzer Battalion" blares in our ears? :wink: Well, "Panzer Battalion" is more fun as a song than " The Price of a Mile "..... 40 to 1 or Primo Victoria are more relev...
- Sat Nov 07, 2009 2:19 pm
- Forum: Out of Character
- Topic: STGOD rules thread
- Replies: 300
- Views: 64422
This joe's opinion on true cavalry (not mounted infantrymen - I differentiate the two in my ruleset for good reason) is that they make fine scouts until they're replaced by motorcycle troops (which Japan will be doing) or get into an engagement with anything bearing an internal combustion engine an...
- Sat Nov 07, 2009 2:13 pm
- Forum: Out of Character
- Topic: STGOD?
- Replies: 365
- Views: 93631
Japan almost certainly has. Probably a give-take war against Russia in the 190Xs (Hadri willing) or whoever owned the Phillipines before Japan. I think an interesting war would be one against Cascadia Pacifica, jostling for control of the Pacific Islands. Not sure I'd be willing to go any deeper int...
- Thu Nov 05, 2009 10:03 pm
- Forum: Out of Character
- Topic: STGOD rules thread
- Replies: 300
- Views: 64422
- Thu Nov 05, 2009 9:52 pm
- Forum: Out of Character
- Topic: STGOD rules thread
- Replies: 300
- Views: 64422
- Thu Nov 05, 2009 8:48 pm
- Forum: Out of Character
- Topic: STGOD rules thread
- Replies: 300
- Views: 64422
Your statement lent itself to multiple interpretations. Evidently, I chose a wrong one. My apologies. Apologies accepted Captain Needa. No wait, that doesn't quite have the ring I was going for. :wink: It's nothing. You have no way of knowing that I went on a WW1 kick a few years back and read a bu...
- Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:27 pm
- Forum: Out of Character
- Topic: STGOD?
- Replies: 365
- Views: 93631
I'm not really interested in playing a 1930s game. I was looking forward to something between 1900 and 1910, which does not necessarily mean trench warfare, and fun stuff like the development of ABG warships, of early aircraft, of the earliest small-unit tactics. I was especially looking forward to ...
- Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:21 pm
- Forum: Out of Character
- Topic: STGOD rules thread
- Replies: 300
- Views: 64422
Speaking as a vet of a modern war. Infantry is not just a rear guard. Kindly remain in reality when describing your dislikes. I was referring to the worst case, with everybody using nothing but blitzkrieg doctrine all the time and expecting their wunderpanzers to secure victory all by themselves. A...
- Wed Nov 04, 2009 1:51 pm
- Forum: Out of Character
- Topic: STGOD rules thread
- Replies: 300
- Views: 64422
Infantry was far from irrelevant in the tank era. They're essential. The biggest fear a tanker had was a concealed antitank gun blowing his ass away (that's ground pounders 1, tankers 0) before he knew it was there. And that's without talking about city fighting, which is a nightmare for tanks. Goo...
- Wed Nov 04, 2009 1:15 pm
- Forum: Out of Character
- Topic: STGOD rules thread
- Replies: 300
- Views: 64422
I too find trench warfare to be interesting. Especially the process of adapting from open-field warfare to the tactics required to gain ground in a siege-warfare situation. As far as tanks go, I'm 110% against them until the Great War happens and things are so incredibly bloody and stagnant that the...
- Tue Nov 03, 2009 11:45 pm
- Forum: Out of Character
- Topic: STGOD rules thread
- Replies: 300
- Views: 64422
Frankly, I could work with either system, but Hadrian's would give me more leeway to build the sort of distinctly-Roman army that I had in mind. Then again, that might not necessarily be a good thing. I have an auxiliary system, but it didn't meet Frigid's criteria, so I didn't post it. I'll post i...
- Tue Nov 03, 2009 4:23 pm
- Forum: Out of Character
- Topic: STGOD rules thread
- Replies: 300
- Views: 64422
Everything is so much easier when all the numbers end in 5 or 0. ;)Hadrianvs wrote:Yes, exactly one point better.Ezekiel wrote:I can do Hadrianus one better on creating a 100pt army. Observe!
As I said already, your ideas are good, they're just not good this time. Not within the criteria ("simple") and all.
- Tue Nov 03, 2009 4:14 pm
- Forum: Out of Character
- Topic: STGOD rules thread
- Replies: 300
- Views: 64422
I can do Hadrianus one better on creating a 100pt army. Observe! 100 -6 Foot Infantry Divisions (60) 40 -6 Artillery Regiments (30) 10 -2 Engineer Regiments (10) This makes two corps of the following: -3 Foot Infantry Divisions (27,000 riflemen & 3000 scout cavalry) -3 Divisional Artillery Regiments...
- Tue Nov 03, 2009 3:58 pm
- Forum: Out of Character
- Topic: STGOD rules thread
- Replies: 300
- Views: 64422
Hadrian, I gotta say that your idea is a good one, just not for this game. Frigid said he wanted something simple, and yours is unfortunately not. You should definately develop it further though, make a system of your own for another game or sommat. Ironically, I too was going to make a regiment/bri...
- Mon Nov 02, 2009 9:14 pm
- Forum: Out of Character
- Topic: STGOD rules thread
- Replies: 300
- Views: 64422
That's...all you have to say? That a couple players might bitch about not having air forces yet? :|frigidmagi wrote:I can think of 2 or 3 players that won't wash for. Plus we're not settled on the opening date apprantely.Air forces will be limited to level 1 until 1910 - planes just aren't that common yet.
- Mon Nov 02, 2009 4:46 pm
- Forum: Out of Character
- Topic: STGOD rules thread
- Replies: 300
- Views: 64422
Well, I know Zeke will grumble in irritation of the SDN counterpart being brought up, but I just proposed a system for defining sophistication of armed forces - at least Army and Air Force - by a combination of specific Focus score with Industry and Economy. *grumblegrumble* :smile: Okay, going fro...